1. How would you say your films affect your still image works? Do you try to have a narrative in each photograph?
2. Your photographs deal with very sexualized women, and many of you videos seem to revolve around women unconcious on the floor surrounded by men. Are these two themes connected in some way or are they simply two different concepts?
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Alyssa Salomon
I love the way the technique Salomon uses works well with her subjects. She turns her work into something small and delicate. Her work has a very illustrated feel to it due to the contrast and painterly feel that her techniques use. Like my work, most of her environment are in nature but are more of a documentation of it, it is more of an interaction.
Bio:
Salomon was born in Brooklyn, New York and attended Kenyon College for her BA. She has been in many solo and group shows in the Richmond area and also has work that is part of the permanent collection for Capital One. She also received a VMFA fellowship in 2000.
Quotes:
"Alyssa C. Salomon is a photographer and sculptor who explores the use of photographs as objects through which we narrate our everyday lives."-Newdags (review link)
" She came to daguerreotype making in 2000 in her quest for the ultimate photographic object. Daguerreotypes are physical: you hold the weighty thing in your hand. Daguerreotypes are precious: made with pure silver, sheets of copper, and gold chemistry. " -NewDags
gallery
review
Website
Friday, March 11, 2011
Whirlpools
I realize that this has nothing really to do with my series but after seeing the video about the whirlpool that has developed off the coast of Japan, I have become extremely interested in the idea of whirlpools. They are always something that you hear of in medieval and fantasy stories or in movies about pirates. The idea of an actual whirlpool has a fictional feel to it, so it becomes terrifying yet fascinating when one hears about them occurring in real life. I feel therefore this connects with my idea of taking things that actually exist in the world but making them become part of the subject imagination.
Quotes:
"It is merely a matter of size. If the maelstrom is large enough and the boat or other object is small enough, the object will be drawn down through the vortex along with the water. It is understandable then, that fables exist about large ships being sucked down and eaten up by giant whirlpools, but actual documented cases that we would consider trustworthy do not exist"
"But most people are more familiar with smaller less dangerous whirlpools that occur in streams or at the bottom of waterfalls. To be sure, these whirlpools can cause lots of problems for watercraft, and they can pull people down and not let them up. So they are dangerous, but not to the scale of a maelstrom whirlpool that can swallow a boat."
"Spiral Wishing Wells." Spiral Wishing Well Coin Funnel. Web. 11 Mar. 2011. <http://www.spiralwishingwells.com/guide/whirlpools.html>.
This article was extremely informative and easy to read about the actual facts of whirlpools. It admits that there are whirlpools that can suck down a boat, but that these are rare. The average whirlpool can suck down small objects like people and rowing boats, but now ships. It also explained how whirlpool form, and why a vacuum occurs.
Monday, March 7, 2011
Keith Carter
I love the distorted realities that Carter creates with his work. His images have a surreal effect despite the fact that they take place in ordinary settings and of ordinary subject. The way he uses shadow, blurring, and vignetting creates a new world. I find this is an interesting approach to distorting reality in comparison with how my series' interpretation.
Biography from website:
"Keith Carter is an internationally recognized photographer and educator. Born in Madison, Wisconsin in 1948,he holds the endowed Walles Chair of Art at Lamar University Beaumont, Texas. He is the recipient of the Lange-Taylor Prize from The Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University, and The Texas Medal of Arts. In addition Keith Carter has been the subject of an arts profile on CBS Sunday Morning, and Anthropy Arts produced a documentary DVD of his work. He is the Lamar University Distinguished Faculty Lecturer, as well as being named the 2010 TSUS Regents Professor."
Quotes:
"I don’t think science is necessarily incompatible with mystical or spiritual sensibilities. I often weigh them equally in my thinking, which sometimes finds itself into the work" - Keith Carter
"I like to work in the real world, so I do a lot of searching or just simple looking. But I’m not above tweaking reality and making something up. I don’t think there are any rules in art. It’s not so much what you see as it is the significance you, the artist, see in it." - Keith Carter
Gallery
Website
Interview
Biography from website:
"Keith Carter is an internationally recognized photographer and educator. Born in Madison, Wisconsin in 1948,he holds the endowed Walles Chair of Art at Lamar University Beaumont, Texas. He is the recipient of the Lange-Taylor Prize from The Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University, and The Texas Medal of Arts. In addition Keith Carter has been the subject of an arts profile on CBS Sunday Morning, and Anthropy Arts produced a documentary DVD of his work. He is the Lamar University Distinguished Faculty Lecturer, as well as being named the 2010 TSUS Regents Professor."
Quotes:
"I don’t think science is necessarily incompatible with mystical or spiritual sensibilities. I often weigh them equally in my thinking, which sometimes finds itself into the work" - Keith Carter
"I like to work in the real world, so I do a lot of searching or just simple looking. But I’m not above tweaking reality and making something up. I don’t think there are any rules in art. It’s not so much what you see as it is the significance you, the artist, see in it." - Keith Carter
Gallery
Website
Interview
Precious
Precious possessions is a running theme in my series. It is represented as a material object but in concept it is actually an idea, a want, sometime that cannot be touched. It is interesting to see thought how the value of a material precious possession changes constantly. Owning sometime considered "precious" has become a business transaction, a way for people to make money. I find this affects to the way that my subject views their "precious" object.
"Gold had gained 2% from Friday through Wednesday's record settlement of $1,437.70 as tumult in the Middle East and North Africa boosted the metal as a so-called safe-haven investment. A surge in oil prices on the news also helped lift gold as an inflation hedge."-WSJ.com
"the dip in gold prices may provide opportunities for bargain hunters, said Haberkorn, who expects prices will resume their uptrend."- WSJ.com
"Gold had gained 2% from Friday through Wednesday's record settlement of $1,437.70 as tumult in the Middle East and North Africa boosted the metal as a so-called safe-haven investment. A surge in oil prices on the news also helped lift gold as an inflation hedge."-WSJ.com
"the dip in gold prices may provide opportunities for bargain hunters, said Haberkorn, who expects prices will resume their uptrend."- WSJ.com
"PRECIOUS METALS: Gold Pulls Back From Record As Haven Need Wanes - WSJ.com." Business News & Financial News - The Wall Street Journal - Wsj.com. Web. 03 Mar. 2011. <http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110303-709905.html>. This was a very informative article about how the value of gold has gone down somewhat. Due to the economy and current affairs, the cost has gone down which means that this is the perfect time to buy gold. I found the article was very easy to read as someone who does not know much about the gold business or economics.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Kathy Rose response
I was not a huge fan of the lecture today for Kathy Rose. I found it odd that she barley spoke about her work during the lecture, and did not mention concept or much about inspiration. her work has definatley evolved with the changing technology due to her early work dealing with hand drawn animation and her later work being extremely digital. I feel overall I would describe her work as vibrant, moving, and intentional. Due to the performance aspect being such an important part of her animations, she must make sure that everything is planned out. Like I had wondered before the lecture, she does plan out each part of the performance, but whether the movement or the animation comes first, all depends on the project, and changes constantly.
Her earlier work I found the most interesting due to the mixture of animation and dance, and the polished look due to the cohesiveness of the two. I did not know that she had dance experience which obviously inspired her work in the 80's. I feel the fact that she merged two art forms into one performance made her work very interesting. I find this body of work to be the most compelling because everything has to be planned out, yet the performance looks like an improvisation, due to her movements.
Rose's most recent work I was not as impressed with as her early work. I found it seemed too digital and the overall effect did not have the finessing that her earlier work did. The videos were awkward and became boring to watch. I also did not like many of the special effects because they did not seem to work well and the technical downfalls overshadowed the overall work. I wonder why she has not considered going back to less computerized approaches since those worked much better with her vision.
Her earlier work I found the most interesting due to the mixture of animation and dance, and the polished look due to the cohesiveness of the two. I did not know that she had dance experience which obviously inspired her work in the 80's. I feel the fact that she merged two art forms into one performance made her work very interesting. I find this body of work to be the most compelling because everything has to be planned out, yet the performance looks like an improvisation, due to her movements.
Rose's most recent work I was not as impressed with as her early work. I found it seemed too digital and the overall effect did not have the finessing that her earlier work did. The videos were awkward and became boring to watch. I also did not like many of the special effects because they did not seem to work well and the technical downfalls overshadowed the overall work. I wonder why she has not considered going back to less computerized approaches since those worked much better with her vision.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Katy Rose Questions
1. When creating what you will project, do you think about how it will interact with the live subject, or do you plan out the placement of the subject after?
2. Your current work is very different from your earlier work in the 70s and 80s. Does this have a lot to do with better technology being available?
2. Your current work is very different from your earlier work in the 70s and 80s. Does this have a lot to do with better technology being available?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)